PEOPLE v. AGARD

10483, 4234/09.

107 A.D.3d 613 (2013)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KENITH AGARD, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided June 27, 2013.


The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant's application to substitute new counsel after giving him repeated opportunities to explain why he wanted a different lawyer (see People v Porto, 16 N.Y.3d 93, 100 [2010]). Defendant was not prevented from explaining why he wanted a new lawyer (compare e.g. People v Branham, 59 A.D.3d 244 [1st Dept 2009]). On the contrary, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases