1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 107 A.D.3d
  5. 107 A.D.3d 926 (2013)
 

BORQUIST v. HYDE PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DIST.

2012-06925.

107 A.D.3d 926 (2013)

966 N.Y.S.2d 888

2013 NY Slip Op 4765

ERIC F. BORQUIST, Respondent, v. HYDE PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 26, 2013.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants bore the initial burden of establishing as a matter of law that the scar on Danielle Borquist's face did not constitute a "`significant disfigurement'" (Onder v Kaminski, 303 A.D.2d 665, 666 [2003], quoting Insurance Law § 5102 [d]), defined as a condition which is unattractive, objectionable, or the object of pity and scorn (see e.g. Maldonado v Piccirilli...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases