Defendants made a prima facie showing of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. They submitted evidence showing that a time of the essence closing was scheduled for June 30, 2005, that plaintiff and his attorney were notified of the closing, that the Referee was ready, willing and able to close, and that plaintiff failed to appear, resulting in a default and the forfeit of his deposit pursuant to the terms of sale (see 225 5th, LLC v Volynets,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HOSSAIN v. SELECHNIK
10406, 23348/05, 10406A.
107 A.D.3d 549 (2013)
968 N.Y.S.2d 47
2013 NY Slip Op 4689
KAZI A. HOSSAIN, Appellant, v. JACOB SELECHNIK et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 20, 2013.
Decided June 20, 2013.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
