1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 107 A.D.3d
  5. 107 A.D.3d 859 (2013)
 

MEDINA v. R.M. RESOURCES

2011-10856, (Index No. 8072/04).

107 A.D.3d 859 (2013)

968 N.Y.S.2d 533

2013 NY Slip Op 4582

STEPHEN MEDINA et al., Respondents, v. R.M. RESOURCES et al., Appellants, and INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, Respondent (And a Third-Party Action.) (Appeal No. 1.) STEPHEN MEDINA et al., Appellants, v. R.M. RESOURCES et al., Defendants, and INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY, Respondent. (And a Third-Party Action.) (Appeal No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 19, 2013.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendants R.M. Resources, Costco Wholesale Corporation, Ruland-110 Associates, L.P., MS Venture Corp., Better Ruland Road Associates, L.P., and Best Ruland, Inc., from so much of the order as granted the motion of the defendant Ingersoll-Rand Company for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant is dismissed, as they are not aggrieved by that portion of the order (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v TBV...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases