As the presentment agency concedes, the Family Court erred in ordering testimony to proceed in appellant's absence. While the court briefly inquired into appellant's whereabouts and learned that defense counsel did not know where she was, the court did not make a determination that appellant's absence was deliberate, or state any grounds for reaching such a conclusion (see People v Brooks,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.