To vacate their default in appearing at an arbitration, TLAM, Inc., and Lauretta Frazer (hereinafter together the TLAM defendants) were required to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their nonappearance at an arbitration and a potentially meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Matter of Government Empls. Ins. Co. v Dae-Hee Lee,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF LEISURE v. TLAM, INC.
2011-10742.
107 A.D.3d 721 (2013)
967 N.Y.S.2d 104
2013 NY Slip Op 4008
In the Matter of ROYAL LEISURE, Respondent, v. TLAM, INC., et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 5, 2013.
Decided June 5, 2013.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.