The February 11, 2009 letter from defendant Levien to plaintiffs' counsel was sufficient to make the closing on the sale of defendant Bosler's apartment to plaintiffs time of the essence. Regardless of whether the notice to plaintiffs was reasonable, plaintiffs did not voice their objections prior to the closing date, and thus acquiesced, as a matter of law, in the reasonableness of the closing date (see Zev v Merman,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
WESTREICH v. BOSLER
10137, 102906/09.
106 A.D.3d 569 (2013)
965 N.Y.S.2d 467
2013 NY Slip Op 3604
LESLIE WESTREICH et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE G. BOSLER et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 21, 2013.
Decided May 21, 2013.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
