PRINE v. SANTEE

No. 140 SSM 9.

21 N.Y.3d 923 (2013)

989 N.E.2d 966

967 N.Y.S.2d 684

2013 NY Slip Op 3267

MARK A. PRINE, Appellant, v. ADAM M. SANTEE, Appellant, and ANNA TORRES, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided May 7, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Magavern Magavern Grimm LLP, Buffalo ( Edward J. Markarian of counsel), for Mark A. Prine, appellant.

Chelus, Herdzik, Speyer & Monte, P.C., Buffalo ( Katelyn E. Dieffenderfer and Scott R. Orandoff of counsel), for Adam M. Santee appellant.

Law Office of Daniel R. Archilla, Buffalo ( Jill Z. Florkowski of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and RIVERA concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff Mark A. Prine and defendant Adam M. Santee (see e.g. Branham v Loews Orpheum Cinemas, Inc., 8 N.Y.3d 931, 932 [2007]), defendant Anna Torres demonstrated her entitlement to summary judgment dismissing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases