PINEDA v. IRVIN

571057/12.

40 Misc.3d 5 (2013)

968 N.Y.S.2d 311

2013 NY Slip Op 23131

FRANCISCO PINEDA et al., Appellants, v. DANIELLE IRVIN, Respondent, et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

Decided April 16, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rivkin Radler LLP, Uniondale ( Erez Glambosky of counsel), for appellants. Danielle Irvin, respondent pro se.

SCHOENFELD, J.P. HUNTER, JR. and TORRES, JJ., concur.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Final judgment, entered July 18, 2012, affirmed, with $25 costs.

The holdover eviction proceeding was properly dismissed after trial, in view of petitioners' failure to meet their threshold burden of proving the petition's allegations that the apartment premises sought to be recovered are exempt from rent stabilization coverage since the building that houses it is not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases