1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.Y.3d
  4. 20 N.Y.3d
  5. 20 N.Y.3d 534 (2013)
 

GELMAN v. BUEHLER

No. 37.

20 N.Y.3d 534 (2013)

986 N.E.2d 914

964 N.Y.S.2d 80

2013 NY Slip Op 1991

GEOFFREY GELMAN, Respondent, v. ANTONIO BUEHLER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of New York.

Decided March 26, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Niehaus LLP, New York City ( Paul R. Niehaus and S. Gabriel Hayes-Williams of counsel), for appellant.

Geoffrey Gelman, respondent pro se.

Chief Judge LIPPMAN and Judges READ, SMITH and PIGOTT concur; Judge RIVERA taking no part.

OPINION OF THE COURT

GRAFFEO, J.

Partnership Law § 62 (1) (b) states that a partnership formed by oral agreement may be dissolved unilaterally if "no definite term or particular undertaking is specified" in the underlying agreement. Because the parties in this case did not sufficiently address either of these provisions in their oral contract, we conclude that there was no breach of contract when one party...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases