1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 106 A.D.3d
  5. 106 A.D.3d 27 (2013)
 

DOORLEY v. DeMARCO

122 OP 12-01563.

106 A.D.3d 27 (2013)

962 N.Y.S.2d 546

2013 NY Slip Op 1937

In the Matter of SANDRA DOORLEY, Petitioner-Plaintiff, v. JOHN L. DeMARCO et al., Respondents-Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided March 22, 2013.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Kelly Christine Wolford of counsel), petitioner-plaintiff pro se.

Honorable John L. DeMarco, Rochester, respondent-defendant pro se.

Timothy P. Donaher , Public Defender, Rochester ( James Eckert of counsel), for respondents-defendants Dalana J. Watford and another.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr. , New York City ( Victoria M. White of counsel), for District Attorneys Association of the State of New York, amicus curiae.

PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS and WHALEN, JJ., concur.

OPINION OF THE COURT

CENTRA, J.P.

I

Petitioner-plaintiff, the District Attorney of Monroe County (petitioner), commenced this original hybrid CPLR article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action against respondents-defendants Honorable John L. DeMarco and Honorable John R. Schwartz (respondent judges), as well as against respondents-defendants Dalana J. Watford and Annie Pearl Pugh, both criminal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases