SCHINDLER EL v. 475 PARK AVE.

571112/12.

39 Misc.3d 18 (2013)

963 N.Y.S.2d 812

2013 NY Slip Op 23069

SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORPORATION, Respondent, v. 475 PARK AVENUE SO. CO. et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

March 12, 2013.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harwood Reiff LLC, New York City ( Donald A. Harwood of counsel), for appellants. Law Offices of Edward Weissman, New York City ( Edward Weissman of counsel), for respondent.


OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

Order, entered September 21, 2012, reversed, with $10 costs, motion denied and defendants-appellants' counterclaims reinstated.

The disputed language contained in article 7 of the governing elevator maintenance agreement — amorphously headed "Responsibility" — is ambiguous, i.e., "reasonably susceptible of more than one interpretation" (One Hundred Grand, Inc. v Chaplin, 70 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases