1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 102 A.D.3d
  5. 102 A.D.3d 928 (2013)
 

KORCHAK v. SANTANA

2012-02254.

102 A.D.3d 928 (2013)

958 N.Y.S.2d 484

2013 NY Slip Op 461

HALYNA KORCHAK, Appellant, et al., Plaintiff, v. JOSE E. SANTANA, Respondent, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 30, 2013.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

While the appellant's motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 3126 to preclude was pending, the defendant Jose E. Santana (hereinafter the respondent) complied with the disclosure order dated March 22, 2010. Accordingly, while we do not condone the respondent's delays in adhering to court-ordered discovery schedules (see Miceli v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 3 N.Y.3d 725...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases