1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 102 A.D.3d
  5. 102 A.D.3d 907 (2013)
 

CHARLES v. WILLIAM HIRD & CO., INC.

2011-09040.

102 A.D.3d 907 (2013)

959 N.Y.S.2d 506

2013 NY Slip Op 450

RENATA CHARLES, Respondent, v. WILLIAM HIRD & CO., INC., et al., Respondents-Appellants, and TRANSCARE CORPORATION et al., Appellants-Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 30, 2013.

Ordered that the appeal by the defendants William Hird & Co., Inc., and Daniel Murray from so much of the order as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Transcare Corporation and Michael Young which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them is dismissed, as the defendants William Hird & Co., Inc., and Daniel Murray are not aggrieved by that portion of the order (see CPLR 5511; Mixon v TBV, Inc.,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases