Substantial evidence supports the findings that petitioner falsely reported that he was unable to work from October 2008 to June 2009; that he engaged in unauthorized outside employment; and that he lied under oath when he denied engaging in such outside employment at his workers' compensation hearing. There exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the Administrative Law Judge (see generally Matter of Berenhaus v Ward,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
