1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 102 A.D.3d
  5. 102 A.D.3d 847 (2013)
 

PAUYO v. PAUYO

2011-08383.

102 A.D.3d 847 (2013)

959 N.Y.S.2d 215

2013 NY Slip Op 316

FRITZ PAUYO et al., Respondents, v. JOCELYNE A. PAUYO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 23, 2013.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In an order dated October 7, 2009, a Court Attorney Referee (hereinafter the Referee) determined, after a hearing, that certain documents transferring all outstanding shares of Fito Taxi Service, Inc. (hereinafter Fito Taxi), from the defendant Jocelyne A. Pauyo (hereinafter the former wife) to the plaintiff Fritz Pauyo (hereinafter the former husband) were not fraudulent and had been validly executed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases