Clear and convincing evidence supports the court's finding that respondent is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement (see Mental Hygiene Law § 10.11 [d] [4]).
To prove that a respondent is a dangerous sex offender requiring confinement, the State must show, inter alia, that, if not confined, the respondent "is likely to be a danger to others and to commit sex offenses" (Mental Hygiene Law § 10.07 [f]). A sex
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.