1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 102 A.D.3d
  5. 102 A.D.3d 644 (2013)
 

BRADLEY v. BRADLEY

2011-08549.

102 A.D.3d 644 (2013)

956 N.Y.S.2d 901

2013 NY Slip Op 57

FUMIKO MACHINAGA BRADLEY, Respondent, v. ADAM T. BRADLEY, Appellant. (Action No. 1.). ADAM T. BRADLEY, Appellant, v. FUMIKO MACHINAGA BRADLEY, Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 9, 2013.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying those branches of the appellant's motion which were to establish a charging lien in the sum of $150,000 in favor of the law firm of Bodnar & Milone LLP (see 22 NYCRR 1400.2; see generally Gottlieb v Gottlieb,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases