In this foreclosure action, the motion court improperly modified the parties' so-ordered stipulation with regard to the agreed-upon minimum sale price of the property jointly owned by Ting and defendants-appellants, the latter whom opposed the modification. Ting did not establish that she should be relieved from the consequences of the stipulation due to fraud, collusion, mistake or accident (see Hallock v State of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
BANK OF AM. NATL. ASSN. v. LAM
8950, 115035/09.
2013 NY Slip Op 00038
BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO LASALLE BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ETC., Plaintiff, v. CHAU T. LAM, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants, YAH RONG TING, Defendant-Respondent, ADAMAR OF NEW JERSEY INC., ET AL., Defendants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 8, 2013.
Decided January 8, 2013.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mark L. Cortegiano , Middle Village, for appellants.
Rubin & Licatesi, P.C., Garden City ( Richard L. Rubin of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Tom, J.P., Andrias, Freedman, Román, Gische, JJ.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
