WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. v. VAN DYKE

8893, 382738/09.

101 A.D.3d 638 (2012)

2012 NY Slip Op 9164

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Respondent, v. JUNE JOAN VAN DYKE et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

December 27, 2012.


Defendants failed to demonstrate that plaintiff's representative was not fully authorized to negotiate a settlement of this residential foreclosure action on plaintiff's behalf or that the negotiations that were had were a sham (see CPLR 3408). Contrary to defendants' apparent belief, plaintiff was not required by CPLR 3408 to offer them a settlement. While the aspirational goal of CPLR 3408 negotiations is that the parties "reach a mutually agreeable resolution to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases