Since defendant made only a general motion for a trial order of dismissal, and since the court did not make any ruling that addressed the specific arguments defendant makes for the first time on appeal, defendant's legal sufficiency claim is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. We also find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DEOLALL
8844, 2231/09.
101 A.D.3d 562 (2012)
956 N.Y.S.2d 46
2012 NY Slip Op 8789
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. PREMNATH DEOLALL, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 20, 2012.
December 20, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
