Regardless of whether the introduction of the uncharged crime evidence was error, it was harmless in the face of the overwhelming proof of defendant's guilt. The victim clearly identified defendant as the robber both at a lineup and in court. She had an excellent opportunity to view defendant during the encounter because she was face to face with him in a well-lit store. Furthermore, the victim's identification was corroborated
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. CHAPMAN
8427, 815/08.
101 A.D.3d 406 (2012)
954 N.Y.S.2d 534
2012 NY Slip Op 8244
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. TERRY CHAPMAN, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
December 4, 2012.
December 4, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
