1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 100 A.D.3d
  5. 100 A.D.3d 528 (2012)
 

PEOPLE v. DICKS

8613, 1884/08.

100 A.D.3d 528 (2012)

954 N.Y.S.2d 83

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RANDY DICKS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

November 20, 2012.

Recordings of incriminating conversations between defendant and other persons were properly authenticated by participants' testimony that the recordings were accurate, complete and unaltered (see People v Ely, 68 N.Y.2d 520, 527 [1986]; People v Agudelo, 96 A.D.3d 611 [1st Dept 2012]). Defendant's identity as a participant in the conversations was sufficiently established by the testimony...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases