The determination that respondent's actions did not rise to the level of the family offenses of harassment in the second degree, menacing in the third degree and disorderly conduct is supported by a fair preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 832). Petitioner did not offer sufficient evidence in support of her petition, and there exists no basis to disturb the credibility determinations of the court (see Matter of Everett C. v Oneida P.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF FATIMA V. v. RAMON V.
8589.
100 A.D.3d 509 (2012)
953 N.Y.S.2d 854
In the Matter of FATIMA V., Appellant, v. RAMON V., Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 15, 2012.
November 15, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
