Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his request for a downward departure from a presumptive risk level three designation to a risk level one designation pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C [hereinafter SORA]) following a risk assessment hearing. However, although the defendant identified a mitigating factor of a kind, or to a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
