We find that the verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence. We further find that it was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson,
To establish the crime of official misconduct, the People had to prove that each defendant committed an act "relating to his office" that constituted an "unauthorized exercise of his official functions," that he knew the act was unauthorized...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.