THOMAS v. CEFOLA

2010-10372.

99 A.D.3d 986 (2012)

952 N.Y.S.2d 465

2012 NY Slip Op 7101

LITTEN T. THOMAS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CEFOLA, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 24, 2012.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant, there was a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead rational people to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented (see Bergamo v Verizon N.Y., Inc., 95 A.D.3d 916, 917 [2012]; Hammond v Diaz,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases