Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant, there was a valid line of reasoning and permissible inferences which could lead rational people to the conclusion reached by the jury on the basis of the evidence presented (see Bergamo v Verizon N.Y., Inc.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
THOMAS v. CEFOLA
2010-10372.
99 A.D.3d 986 (2012)
952 N.Y.S.2d 465
2012 NY Slip Op 7101
LITTEN T. THOMAS, Appellant, v. MICHAEL CEFOLA, Respondent.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 24, 2012.
October 24, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.