1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 99 A.D.3d
  5. 99 A.D.3d 962 (2012)
 

AMOROSO v. STOP & SHOP

2012-00335.

99 A.D.3d 962 (2012)

952 N.Y.S.2d 469

2012 NY Slip Op 7081

JOYCE AMOROSO, Respondent, v. STOP AND SHOP, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

October 24, 2012.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The defendant Stop and Shop (hereinafter the moving defendant) failed to demonstrate that the venue of this action should be changed from Queens County to Nassau County. The moving defendant failed to substantiate its claim that, upon the discontinuance of this action against the defendant Hempstead Turnpike, LLC, none of the parties was a resident of Queens County, since it failed to submit...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases