Initially, the motion court properly granted renewal, as the interest of justice warranted such relief in light of the employer's viable argument as to the meaning of the disputed contract terms and the new facts raised in the employer's renewal affidavits concerning, inter alia, the employer's practice and policy
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
SPINAC v. CARLTON GROUP, LTD.
114579/07, 8350, 8350A.
99 A.D.3d 603 (2012)
952 N.Y.S.2d 870
2012 NY Slip Op 7067
LEVERETT J. SPINAC, Respondent, v. THE CARLTON GROUP, LTD., et al., Defendants, and CARLTON ADVISORY SERVICES, INC., Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 23, 2012.
October 23, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.