1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 99 A.D.3d
  5. 99 A.D.3d 476 (2012)
 

HADDA v. LISSNER & LISSNER LLP

8216, 109329/10.

99 A.D.3d 476 (2012)

952 N.Y.S.2d 126

2012 NY Slip Op 6736

ANNEMARIE HADDA, by Her Attorneys-in-Fact, CERI E. HADDA, JANET HADDA and KATHERINE B. HADDA, et al., Respondents, v. LISSNER & LISSNER LLP et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

October 9, 2012.

Defendants made out a prima facie showing that the three-year statutory limitations period (CPLR 214 [6]) expired before this legal malpractice action was commenced in July 2010. Plaintiffs failed to raise an issue of fact whether the doctrine of continuous representation applied here to toll the limitations period (see Glamm v Allen, 57 N.Y.2d 87, 94 [1982]; CLP Leasing Co., LP v Nessen...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases