The court properly denied defendant's motion to suppress statements. Defendant did not preserve his claim that governmental involvement in the actions of store security personnel created a police-dominated atmosphere requiring Miranda warnings, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. The court did not "expressly decide[ ]" the issue "in response to a protest by a party" (CPL 470.05 [2]; see People v Turriago,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. COOPER
8180, 4191/08.
99 A.D.3d 453 (2012)
952 N.Y.S.2d 23
2012 NY Slip Op 6656
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JERMAINE COOPER, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
October 4, 2012.
October 4, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
