Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.
The Supreme Court acted within its inherent power when it resentenced the defendant to the same sentence it had imposed previously, but added an express provision that, as required by Penal Law § 70.25 (2-a), the sentence was to run consecutively to an undischarged indeterminate sentence that had been imposed in 1994 (see People v Minaya,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.