1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 98 A.D.3d
  5. 98 A.D.3d 1038 (2012)
 

YORK v. YORK

2011-00564.

98 A.D.3d 1038 (2012)

950 N.Y.S.2d 911

2012 NY Slip Op 6212

ESTHER YORK, Appellant, v. JOSEPH YORK, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

September 19, 2012.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A motion for a mistrial is directed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and is to be made on a case-by-case basis (see Frankson v Philip Morris Inc., 31 A.D.3d 372, 373 [2006]). The trial court providently exercised its discretion in denying that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for a mistrial.

Further, absent a legal disqualification under Judiciary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases