Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
There is no merit to the defendant's contention that the Supreme Court failed to adequately explore his waiver of an alleged conflict of interest stemming from the fact that his trial attorney had in the past represented one of the prosecution witnesses in an unrelated civil matter. The record reveals that this potential conflict was fully disclosed by counsel and adequately explored by the Supreme Court, after which the defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
