Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that the photographic array identification procedure employed in this case was unduly suggestive is without merit. "In determining whether a photographic array was `unduly suggestive' the hearing court should consider whether there was any substantial likelihood that the defendant would be singled out for identification" (People v
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.