1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 96 A.D.3d
  5. 96 A.D.3d 1051 (2012)
 

MATTER OF BAGINSKI v. ROSTKOWSKI

2011-09407.

96 A.D.3d 1051 (2012)

946 N.Y.S.2d 886

2012 NY Slip Op 5166

In the Matter of JAN BAGINSKI, Respondent, v. MIECZYSTAW ROSTKOWSKI, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

June 27, 2012.

Ordered that the order of protection is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Although the Family Court failed to specify the particular family offense under Family Court Act § 812 (1) that the appellant committed, remittal is not necessary because the record is sufficient for this Court to conduct an independent review of the evidence (see Matter of Drury v Drury, 90 A.D.3d 754, 754 [2011]). The evidence adduced...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases