Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's specific contention regarding the legal sufficiency of the evidence that the gun he was charged with having possessed was operable is not preserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to move for a trial order of dismissal on the basis of that specific claim (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hawkins,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.