After reviewing the entire record and considering the factors set forth in CPL 510.30 (2) (a), we find that the amount of bail set by the trial court was unreasonable and an abuse of discretion, and that, taking into account the risk of petitioner's flight, bail in the reduced amount indicated is sufficient to ensure petitioner's attendance (see e.g. People ex rel. Robinson v Warden,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
