Ordered that the order entered September 21, 2011, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
A motion for leave to renew pursuant to CPLR 2221 (e) "may, in the Supreme Court's discretion, be based on facts known to the party seeking renewal at the time of the original motion," but the movant must offer "a reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the original motion" (Dervisevic v Dervisevic,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.