"Pursuant to CPLR 3121, following the commencement of an action, if a plaintiff's physical condition is in controversy, the defendant may require the plaintiff to submit to a physical examination. Further, it is within the trial court's discretion to require a plaintiff to submit to more than one physical examination. However, the party seeking the examination must demonstrate the necessity for it" (Chaudhary v Gold,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ORSOS v. HUDSON TRANSIT CORP.
Nos. 6313, 309754/09.
95 A.D.3d 526 (2012)
944 N.Y.S.2d 514
2012 NY Slip Op 3550
ILONA ORSOS, Appellant, v. HUDSON TRANSIT CORP. et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 8, 2012.
Decided May 8, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.