1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 94 A.D.3d
  5. 94 A.D.3d 674 (2012)
 

CAMACHO v. ESPINOZA

Nos. 7492, 300638/09.

94 A.D.3d 674 (2012)

942 N.Y.S.2d 539

2012 NY Slip Op 3278

MIGDALIA CAMACHO, Respondent, v. ANGEL ESPINOZA et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 26, 2012.

Defendants made a prima facie showing that plaintiff's cervical, lumbar, left shoulder, and left wrist injuries were not serious injuries caused by the accident. Defendants submitted affirmed reports of a radiologist and an orthopedist, showing that plaintiff sustained no range of motion limitations, and objective MRI evidence evincing no evidence of traumatic or causally related injury (see Spencer v Golden Eagle, Inc., 82 A.D.3d 589

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases