Ordered that the second resentence is affirmed.
Since the defendant was still serving his first resentence when the second resentence was imposed, the second resentence to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision (hereinafter PRS) did not subject him to double jeopardy or violate his right to due process of law (see People v Lingle,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.