1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 94 A.D.3d
  5. 94 A.D.3d 589 (2012)
 

PEOPLE v. FRYE

Nos. 6906, 3884/08.

94 A.D.3d 589 (2012)

942 N.Y.S.2d 111

2012 NY Slip Op 2955

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KAHREE FRYE, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided April 19, 2012.

The court properly admitted an incriminating letter, since there was adequate circumstantial proof that defendant was the source of the letter (see People v Hamilton, 3 A.D.3d 405 [2004], mod on other grounds 4 N.Y.3d 654 [2005]). The contents and context of the letter strongly indicated that it was written by defendant, and the letter was very similar in content to another letter in evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases