1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.3d
  4. 94 A.D.3d
  5. 94 A.D.3d 819 (2012)
 

HOLTKAMP v. PARKLEX ASSOCIATES

2011-03362.

94 A.D.3d 819 (2012)

941 N.Y.S.2d 874

2012 NY Slip Op 2637

DIEDRICH HOLTKAMP et al., Appellants, v. PARKLEX ASSOCIATES et al., Defendants. FLEMMING ZULACK WILLIAMSON ZAUDERER, LLP, et al., Proposed Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided April 10, 2012.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The conduct alleged by the plaintiffs occurred in part prior to the applicable three-year period of limitations (see Lefkowitz v Appelbaum, 258 A.D.2d 563, 563 [1999]; Jorgensen v Silverman, 224 A.D.2d 665, 665-666 [1996]). Further, the plaintiffs' allegations were not sufficient to set forth a cause of action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases