The trial court's primary findings, that plaintiff was reimbursed for all amounts under claims not barred by the statute of limitations and that defendants did not commit fraud or engage in a persistent pattern of disloyalty that would obligate them to disgorge their management fees dating back to 1996, are amply supported by the evidence (see Claridge Gardens v Menotti,
We have considered plaintiff...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.