Ordered that the order dated March 17, 2011, is affirmed, with costs.
The "new" evidence submitted in support of the appellants' motion for leave to renew the plaintiff's prior cross motion, inter alia, for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the Labor Law § 240(1) cause of action would not have changed the prior determination (see CPLR 2221[e][2]; Grossman v New York Life Ins. Co.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.