The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. The jury reached its finding that the 2001 Glick diamond and the 2005 Krivine diamond are the same diamond based on a fair interpretation of the evidence which showed that the two submissions to the GIA were identical in color, style, and clarity, had the same scratch on the surface, as well as the same cloud and feather inside the stone (Cohen v Hallmark Cards,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. KRIVINE
Nos. 7253, 600040/06.
94 A.D.3d 419 (2012)
941 N.Y.S.2d 145
2012 NY Slip Op 2431
HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, as Subrogee of LOUIS GLICK, Respondent, v. DAVID ANDREW KRIVINE et al., Appellants.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided April 3, 2012.
Decided April 3, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
