HAMILTON v. KING TUNG KONG

2011-10315

93 A.D.3d 821 (2012)

940 N.Y.S.2d 901

2012 NY Slip Op 2284

CHRISTOPHER HAMILTON, Respondent, v. KING TUNG KONG, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 27, 2012.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff pedestrian was crossing a street when he was struck by a vehicle owned and operated by the defendant. The plaintiff established, prima facie, his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by presenting proof that he was walking within a crosswalk and that he looked for approaching traffic before he began to cross (see Rosenblatt v...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases