Respondent was not deprived of due process, and a new trial is not warranted in the interests of justice. Although petitioner's psychologist provided erroneous testimony regarding respondent's score on the Static-99 risk assessment instrument, there was other overwhelming evidence of mental abnormality presented at trial, including the admission of respondent's own expert that respondent was predisposed to commit...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
