The Tribunal's decision—that, pursuant to Administrative Code of City of New York § 11-507 (3), the contribution that petitioner made to a defined benefit plan for a partner is not deductible—was not arbitrary and capricious or contrary to law (see Matter of Proskauer Rose, LLP v Tax Appeals Trib. of City of N.Y.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
IN THE MATTER OF MURPHY & O'CONNELL v. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL
7128.
93 A.D.3d 530 (2012)
940 N.Y.S.2d 592
2012 NY Slip Op 2046
In the Matter of MURPHY & O'CONNELL, Petitioner, v. TAX APPEALS TRIBUNAL et al., Respondents.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 20, 2012.
Decided March 20, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.